|
We are often asked similar questions
about Breathalyzers - how they work, what the differences are, what the
different displays mean etc - so we've gathered together some of the more
typical phone enquires which you may find useful in deciding which device is the
best one for you!
INDEX
History of the Breathalyzer
"Consumer" vs "Police" Breathalysers
How a
Breathalyzer works
How to use a Personal Breathalyser
DOWNLOAD your own Personal Test Sheet
Blood-Alcohol Estimator
Sampling
Methods
Breathalyser Sensor Types
Breathalyser Calibration
Displays and Units of Measurement - BAC%,
mg/l, BrAC etc
Approvals - from UK and US authorities
US DoT
Breathalyzer Clearance - ASD's vs EBT's
Limitations on the use of Personal
Breathalyzers (ASD's)
UK Drink Drive Limits
Mouth alcohol
and the effect on a Breathalyser
Common sources of Breathalyzer errors
and False Positives
Products that interfere with Breathalyzer testing
Popular Breathalyser Myths
Male vs Female metabolism - a recent US
Court Case
Where does the
word "Breathalyzer" come from?
The word Breathalyser was
originally trade-marked by a US company better known for it's
guns Ð Smith & Wesson, but was later sold to European Company
Draeger and has become known as a generalized trademark for all such
instruments. In the USA it was more common to spell the word
"Breathalyzer" with a "z"
and this has also become more common throughout the world.
Early Breathalyzer Use
The original Breathalyzer was
based upon a crystal-filled tube, with a bag to ensure a correct
sample was taken and was introduced into the UK by Draeger in 1967.
Several other manufacturers produced tubes without bags, however
without the bag to determine a correct sample size the results were
far to unreliable for law-enforcement use. In 1979 Draeger produced
the first Digital Breathalyzer, along multiple tests to be carried
out far more accurately.
Consumer
Breathalyzers vs Police Breathalysers
In recent years there has been a large number of "consumer" or
"personal" breathalyzers introduced, however these devices generally
make use of far cheaper semi-conductor based sensors which estimate
the concentration of the sample based upon one or two pre-calibrated
points, typically 0.02% and 0.10% BAC. At these values they tend to
be quite accurate, but away from their datum points the drift can be
quite dramatic Ð anything up to 30-35% variance on cheaper models is
not unusual. The Semi-Conductor technology is however also
dramatically cheaper; whereas a typical Police Breathalyser costs
around £800, many semi-conductor devices sell for less than £30
(although some of their claims for accuracy are at the least,
questionable!)
Hand-held field testing devices are
generally based on electrochemical platinum fuel cell analysis and,
depending upon jurisdiction, may be used by officers in the field as
a form of "field sobriety test" commonly called PBT (preliminary
breath test) or PAS (preliminary alcohol screening) or as evidential
devices in POA (point of arrest) testing. Digital Breath analyzers
do not directly measure blood alcohol content or concentration,
which requires the analysis of a blood sample. Instead, they
estimate BAC indirectly by measuring the amount of alcohol in one's
breath.
How does a Breathalyzer Work?
When you drink, alcohol is digested in the stomach and
passes through the stomach wall into the blood stream. Broadly speaking,
neat alcohol (such as a straight whisky for example) drunk on an empty stomach
is likely to enter the bloodstream more quickly than, say, a milk-based cocktail
drunk after a fairly full meal. This does not mean you will become more
intoxicated from the straight whisky - just that the effect is likely to be felt
more quickly. Once in the blood stream it passes around the body and generates
the usual effects of alcohol on the body and brain. As the blood passes
through the liver it is gradually filtered from the bloodstream, reducing at
each "pass" until there is no longer any residual alcohol in the body. It
also passes through the alveoli in the lungs, and as you breathe and the oxygen
passes into the bloodstream, so does some of the alcohol in your blood
"evaporate" into the air in your lungs. It is this alcohol that a Breathalyser
is designed to measure. This is why it is necessary to measure deep lung air
when using a Breathalyzer (see
"sampling" below),
and why it is important not to drink within 15 minutes of testing - otherwise
alcohol that remains in your mouth will be blown directly into the detector, at
far higher concentrations than is the case from alcohol that has passed through
the stomach, into the bloodstream, and into the air you breathe out. Clearly the
concentrations are often very low and the sensors have to be very sensitive to
detect the levels involved - hence why it is so important not to smoke or drink
before using them and why obtaining an accurate and consistent sample of air is
so important.
The Chemistry of a Fuel Cell Breathalyzer
For those with a technical interest, when the user exhales into
the breathalyzer, any ethanol present in their breath is oxidized to
acetic acid at the anode: CH3CH2OH(g) + H2O(l) → CH3CO2H(l) +
4H+(aq) + 4e- At the cathode, atmospheric oxygen is reduced: O2(g) +
4H+(aq) + 4e- → 2H2O(l). The overall reaction is the oxidation of
ethanol to acetic acid and water: CH3CH2OH(l) + O2(g) → CH3COOH(l) +
H2O(l). The electrical current produced by this reaction is
measured, processed, and displayed as an approximation of overall
blood alcohol content by the breathalyzer.
Homeostatic variables
and Partition Ratios
Breathalyzers assume that the subject being
tested has a 2100-to-1 partition ratio in converting alcohol
measured in the breath to estimates of alcohol in the blood. This
measure is in direct proportion to the amount of grams of alcohol to
every 1 ml of blood. However, this assumed partition ratio varies
from 1300:1 to 3100:1 or wider among individuals and within a given
individual over time. Assuming a true (and US legal) blood-alcohol
concentration of .07%, for example, a person with a partition ratio
of 1500:1 would have a breath test reading of .10%
over the legal limit. Most individuals do, in
fact, have a 2100-to-1 partition ratio in accordance with William
Henry's law, which states that when the water solution of a volatile
compound is brought into equilibrium with air, there is a fixed
ratio between the concentration of the compound in air and its
concentration in water but it is important to appreciate that this
ratio is constant at a given temperature; very few "personal"
breathalysers incorporate a temperature check in their
software/hardware solutions. Breath leaves the mouth at a
temperature of 34 degrees Celsius. To ensure that variables such as
fever and hypothermia could not be pointed out to influence the
results in a way that was harmful to the accused, most instruments
are calibrated at a ratio of 2100:1, underestimating by 9 percent.
In order for a person running a fever to significantly overestimate,
he would have to have a fever that would likely see the subject in
the hospital rather than driving in the first place. Thus, a machine
using a 2100-to-1 ratio could actually overestimate the BAC. As much
as 14% of the population has a partition ratio above 2100, thus
causing the machine to under-report the BAC
How to use a Personal Breathalyzer Although personal devices like the
AlcoSense
and
AlcoHawk
Precision can never replicate the absolute reliability
of something like a
Dräeger 6510 (see "Sampling Methods" and "Sensor
Types" etc below) they can be very useful when used
over a period of time to generate a "picture" of how you absorb alcohol.
Everyone is different, and factors such as the time taken drinking, the last
time you ate and your own metabolic rate can all affect quite dramatically the
rate at which alcohol is absorbed. It is impossible to simply equate 1 "unit"
per hour, or any other simplistic statistic, and then guess your resulting
level. A recent independent test carried out by the IOC newspaper group used one
of our Breathalyzers to test a random sample of drinkers in Croydon one Saturday
night, and the results showed just how wildly wrong people were in trying to
guess their level of intoxication (for the full article,
click here)
Using a personal Breathalyzer on a regular basis means the
user can build up a broad idea of the way in which they personally react, at a
time when they are not going to go anywhere near a vehicle, and can help them to
make sure they do not find themselves still over the limit "the morning after
the night before"!
The way to get the most from your Personal Breathalyzer is
to use it regularly and use it to monitor the change in your level of
intoxication, rather than looking at a single specific reading.. Always wait at
least 15 minutes after drinking or smoking (or you can damage the sensor) and
then test yourself, trying to blow steadily and consistently (see
sampling below) so
that you blow the same each time. Take 3 tests, each approximately 2 minutes
apart, and compare the readings; if one is substantially different to the other
two, try once more. when you have three readings that are within a reasonable
difference of each other, take an average and wait 30 minutes - then test again.
Don't be surprised if the reading is not exactly the same every time - see
Sampling, Sensors
and Displays
below) - carry on testing every 30 minutes until you get a
zero reading. You may well find that the reading initially INCREASES,
between the first few tests and the next - this is because it is taking time for
the alcohol to be absorbed into the blood stream from your stomach. You will
also probably find that the level does not drop by the same amount every half
hour - this is one of the main reasons you bought your detector, to see how YOUR
body reacts and how long it takes to absorb the alcohol.
You can use the guide to
UK limits
below to get some idea of how your readings compare, but
if you intend to drive - do NOT drink!
(back
to top)
Sampling Method
One of the biggest differences between Breathalysers
is the way in which they sample your Breath. Professional, police-grade
Breathalyzers such as the PT750
and UK-Approved
Dräeger 6510
measure an exact volume of air each time they are used -
usually 1.7 litres. They incorporate a flow meter to measure the air and a
physical gate to divert excess air once the required sample has been taken. This
means they can obtain accurate results every time irrespective of how the user
blows.
In contrast, "Personal" Breathalysers have varying methods of
regulating the sample taken - some better than others! The simplest
is the "Blow on" sensor -
Keychain style
and the compact "handbag" types like the
AL2500
all use this method, with a short sample of breath taken
by blowing at the unit. The AL2500 has a vent at the top of the unit
which the user blows through instead of onto but none are able to
take a full sample of deep lung air, but as a result the user must
expect a reasonably large margin error with such units. The
next "step up" is to make the user blow through a tube; this helps
to regulate the rate of sample, and enables a better standard of
measurement to be taken. The lower-priced units like the
Slim and
AlcoHawk
Precision
are all of this type while further up the range again
units like the
AlcoHawk Pro
Digital incorporate a pressure sensor
which ensures a minimum air flow is maintained during sampling
(though none will limit the maximum sample that can be taken).
When used regularly by a single individual, who develops a
consistent blow of around 1.5 litres of air, the "blow-through" types can obtain
a reasonably good level of accuracy, however anyone considering using a
Breathalyzer to test others should only really look at the
PT500, PT750
or 6510
or
similar in order to be certain that the sample is
identical and reliable every time.
(back
to top)
Sensor Types
Traditionally Breathalyzers were all designed around a
device called a Fuel Cell. These are relatively expensive to
manufacture (often £200 or more just for the Fuel Cell) but are
highly accurate and reliable over a wide range and Breathalyzers
certified for evidential use (known in the US as EBT's) use these
sensors. In order to produce a more economic device for personal and
home use various semi-conductor based sensors have been developed,
which use varying levels of software complexity to translate their
readings into equivalent values such as BAC%, mg/l and Microgrammes.
These sensors are more susceptible to drift (where the values
produced gradually vary as the unit gets older and is used more
often), saturation/contamination (for example if the user has been
smoking or drinking recently) and variations in temperature but for
general home use, provided some margin for error is allowed by the
user, can produce some perfectly acceptable results. Semi conductor
based sensors also have a narrower range of sensitivity and are more
complex to calibrate (see below) so for Employers or Enforcement
agencies, who must have a reliable and consistent reading over the
full range of use, only Fuel Cell, EBT-approved devices like the ACS
J5 and Dräeger 6510 are going to produce the required levels of
accuracy and reliability.
Users should also bear in mind that
the accuracy of a particular sensor quoted in the specifications has been
measured under strict laboratory conditions immediately following calibration.
Due to the variations listed above, and particularly the limitations of
sampling, it is unlikely that such specific accuracy is likely to be obtained on
a repeatable basis by the user "in real life" and sensor saturation with
alcohol, or contamination with smoke during a test, can quickly destabilise the
sensor software and lead to unreliable results. Anyone using a "personal"
Breathalyser should leave a substantial margin of error and take into account
general factors such as what and when they've been drinking - you cannot rely
solely on a Personal Alcohol Detector to determine your level of intoxication!
(back
to top)
Calibration
Many handheld breathalyzers sold to consumers use
a silicon oxide sensor which are far more prone to contamination and
interference from substances other than breath alcohol. The sensors
require recalibration or replacement every six months. Higher end
personal breathalyzers and professional-use breath alcohol testers
use platinum fuel cell sensors. These too require recalibration but
at less frequent intervals than semiconductor devices, usually once
a year and they are far more robust when it comes to dealing with
high concentrations, such as would be found (for instance) in a
rehabilitation clinic. There are two methods of calibration
- dry gas, and wet bath simulation and all Breathalyzers can only
remain accurate for so long before they need to be "reset" - or
calibrated - against a known benchmark concentration level of
alcohol. Each method requires specialized equipment and factory
trained technicians. It is not a procedure that can be conducted by
untrained users or without the proper equipment. On the whole a personal detector will remain accurate
provided it is used properly, but once consecutive readings start to
drift by an unacceptable degree then it will need to be
recalibrated. Regular recalibration (roughly every 6 months) also
helps ensure the sensor stays within calibration range; once outside
this range, it cannot be reset.Some semiconductor models are
designed to allow the sensor module to be replaced without the need
to send the unit to a calibration lab however as replacing the
sensor does not test the unit itself "in situ" this method is not as
reliable as having the unit properly serviced by a trained
technician.
Fuel Cell devices will generally "hold" their accuracy for longer, however
because they are usually in use in an evidential environment most companies have
them calibrated at least every six months. Dry gas calibration can only be
carried out on Fuel Cell devices and is generally done at a single concentration
level. Fuel Cells have a much more linear detection range the
semi-conductor based sensors and as such are able to "predict" accurately both
lower and higher concentrations from a single calibration point. The advantage
of dry gas calibration is that little or no expertise is required to operate the
equipment, and large-scale operators such as the police are able to have their
own in-house setup in order to regularly check and calibrate their detectors.
If the readings are not what you expect, first try re-testing on several
occasions to see if blowing technique is an issue - see "how to use a personal
Breathalyzer" and "sampling methods" above
Semi-conductor devices on the other hand are calibrated
using wet-bath simulators, which is a device containing water, mixed with pure
alcohol at a precise level and heated to an exact temperature. A minimum of two
are required, and a Customs & Excise licence is required to purchase and store
the materials. Semi-conductors have a much narrower, and less linear,
range than fuel cells and so are usually calibrated at two points - a "low"
level and "high" level just above and below the expected key point of use - in
the UK, either side of the drink drive limit of 0.08 BAC%. The software in the
unit then compares these two fixed points from the air supplied by the wet bath
simulator and uses them to forecast other readings up and down the range. The
problem however is that it is relying on the software to predict the results,
and the non-linear nature of the sensor means it can only do so to within
certain limits, particularly at very high (more than 0.20 BAC%) or very low
(less than 0.02 BAC%) levels. For personal use, as a general indicator of
changes in the level of intoxication, semi-conductor based Breathalyzers are
very useful devices but users cannot put too much store by any one specific
reading and must allow reasonable margin for error (see Sensor Information
here). To have a Breathalyzer calibrated, see our order page
here.
(back
to top)
Displays and Measurement Units - BAC%, mg/l, microgrammes, etc
There are three basic types of
display; LED's that show a range of values (like the SafeDrive
Keychain and CA1000) and either backlit LCD or Digital LED devices
that produce a digital reading. These displays generally show
three digits, however if calibrated to display the results in BAC%
one digit is always a zero (The UK limit is 0.08%, so even someone 5
times over the UK limit would still only register a reading of
0.40%). Alternative forms of measurement include mg/L (where the
limit is 0.40), mg/100ml (limit 80mg - this is the measurement
reference used by UK police until around 5 years ago) and
Microgrammes (the current Police standard, where the UK limit is 35
microgrammes)
Most "Personal" Breathalyzers sold
in the UK display their results in BAC%, which is the standard most commonly
used in the US. The problem with this standard is that between zero and the
drink-drive limit of 0.08, the unit only displays a change of 8 "steps" of
0.01%, and approximates the values in between. For example, 3 tests taken 2
minutes apart may produce sensor values of 0.045, 0.050, and 0.055 - but all
would display as 0.05. On a unit displaying mg/100ml however, the full reading
would be displayed in full as 045, 050 and 055 allowing the user to make a more
informed decision. Bearing in mind the comments made above with regard to
sampling, it also gives the user more feedback as to the consistency with which
they are using the Breathalyzer.
Certain websites claim that their
devices actually "read" a sample in BrAC - "Breath Alcohol Content". Clearly
this is nonsense - every sensor merely outputs an electrical signal, which is
then converted by the software in the unit to correspond to an accepted value of
measurement. Whether that is BAC%, mg/L, mg/100ml or Microgrammes is irrelevant
- different standards have been adopted by different countries and all are as
valid as each other provided the device is used correctly and properly
calibrated at the time. It is the same as weighing an apple in grams,
pounds, kilos, stones etc - the apple still weighs the same!
(back to top)
UK & USA
Breathalyzer Approval Standards, ASD's vs EBT's In the UK, the Home Office ONLY approve devices for
Police and Law Enforcement use and as yet only Fuel Cell, fixed-volume sampling devices like the
6510 have so far been approved. |While a
minimum standard for Personal Breathalyzers would be highly
desirable at the moment nothing exists and as a result many devices
sold on the UK market are little more than novelty items.
US FDA 510k
Clearance
All breath alcohol testers sold to consumers in the United States
are required to be certified by the Food and Drug Administration,[7]
while those used by law enforcement must be approved by the
Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration. Manufacturers of over-the-counter consumer
breathalyzers must submit an FDA 510(k) Premarket Clearance to
demonstrate that the device to be marketed is at least as safe and
effective, that is, substantially equivalent, to a legally marketed
device (21 CFR 807.92(a) (3)) that is not subject to Premarket
Approval (PMA). Submitters must compare their device to one or more
similar legally marketed devices and make and support their
substantial equivalency claims. It is important to appreciate
however that the FDA Screening Tests do not test the ACCURACY of the
device in ANY WAY WHATSOEVER - they only check to make sure they are
"capable of detecting alcohol". And
that doesn't mean they won't detect other
substances, and report them as alcohol! The devices are cleared as
"screeners" which means they have met the requirements used by the
FDA for detecting the presence of alcohol in the breath, however
Screener certification does not mean that the device can measure
breath alcohol content accurately. Many breathalyzers cleared by
the FDA are very inaccurate when it comes to BAC measurement and no
semiconductor device has ever been approved for evidential use (see
below) by any State Law Enforcement Agencies or
the U.S. Department of Transportation. For personal use,
certification does at least ensure a basic level of performance and
as a pre-screener, backed up by an evidential-level tester, they
certainly have a place in the workplace or clinical areas but their
"results" must
be treated with the scepticism applicable to a far cheaper device
than a professional quality breathalyzer.
US DoT
Breathalyzer Clearance - ASD's vs EBT's
Department of Transportation (DoT) approve two types -
ASD's (Alcohol Screening Devices) and
EBT's (Evidential Breath Testers). Again, only Fuel Cell devices have been approved in the US as EBT's, but there are a substantial number of semi-conductor based devices that have been approved as ASD's, including the AL5000, CA2000, AlcoMate Pro S etc.
Users must remember that the US DoT approval is only limited to their ability to detect the PRESENCE of alcohol. They are NOT assessed for their ability to accurately measure a specific alcohol LEVEL, in the way that an EBT is. They are expected to be used only for general screening, with anyone that indicates anything over zero being re-tested using a properly approved EBT. This makes them a very useful "morning after" device for home use and for measuring the comparative rate that an individuals' body metabolites the alcohol but users must realise that something costing in the region of £50 - £100 is not going to reproduce the level of specific accuracy and reliability of an EBT costing £700 or more.
(back to top)
Limitations of Personal Breathalyzers
All "personal" Breathalyzers (ie. those based around semi-conductor sensors) are either non-approved, or at most approved in the USA as Alcohol Screening Devices (ASD's) and as such the US DoT that approves them advises
"The exact alcohol content in the blood of the test subject cannot exactly be determined by using an Alcohol Screening Device. Only an Evidential Breath Tester or Blood test can be relied upon for accurate determination. Do not Drink and Drive". In addition, the following limitations must be considered:-
The result can be affected by variations in Blow Technique & Temperature -
The unit's calibration can only be certified when issued; it cannot be guaranteed over time and can become contaminated by a single use involving smoke or excessive mouth alcohol (saturation) -
The test reflects only the levels detected at a single point in time and levels of intoxication will often peak sometime AFTER the last drink. -
Regular use of the detector over a period time (see
"how to use a personal Breathalyzer")
is the best way to use a Breathalyzer and learn how alcohol affects the individual person. This can then be used, along with a suitable safety margin, to help ensure the user is clear of alcohol before undertaking critical tasks or driving.
Personal Breathalyzers can only be used to give an indication of the possible presence of alcohol in the blood. The user must NOT rely solely upon the indications provided by this equipment and must use his/her own judgment, taking all factors into account, to determine whether it is safe and/or legal to operate a vehicle.
Various substances can
interfere with the result if not known to the person carrying out the test -
see Common sources of Breathalyzer errors
and False Positives below
(back to top)
UK Drink Drive Limits
The legal limit for alcohol levels in the body while in control of a vehicle vary from country to country and can be defined by several different standards, the following of which are the most common: -
35 microgrammes - as used by professional Breathalyzers such as the Dräeger 6510, XT & 7410 -
80 mg/100ml - as displayed by the AlcoHawk Pro, CA2000 Pro
and AlcoScan 6000 Pro -
0.35 mg/L - as displayed on the AL5000 Pro
0.08% BAC - used by the majority of "consumer" Breathalyzers
For those involved in the transportation industry, much stricter limits apply (for full details see
here) but in principle aircrew, maritime and railway employees are all subject to a limit that is just one quarter of the above, ie: -
9 microgrammes - as used by professional Breathalyzers such as the Dräeger 6510, XT & 7410 -
20 mg/100ml - as displayed by the
AlcoHawk Pro, CA2000 Pro and AlcoScan 6000 Pro -
0.09 mg/L - as displayed on the AL5000 Pro
0.02%BAC - used by the majority of "consumer" Breathalysers
At these low levels only Fuel Cell Evidential Testers are able to provide accurate readings. Although the mg-based Pro S & CA2000 Pro may provide enough resolution to be useful as a general to those working in these industries, they should not be used for testing employees as the results at these levels cannot be relied upon. BAC-based devices are reading to within just two places of a zero reading and are therefore ineffective at these levels.
(back to top)
Mouth alcohol
One of the most common causes of falsely high
breathalyzer readings is the existence of mouth alcohol. In
analyzing a subject's breath sample, the breathalyzer's internal
computer is making the assumption that the alcohol in the breath
sample came from alveolar air that is, air
exhaled from deep within the lungs. However, alcohol may have come
from the mouth, throat or stomach for a number of reasons. So called
blow over or passive testing devices are extremely susceptible to
these issues, and to all intents and purposes are of little more
than novelty use as a result. To help guard against mouth-alcohol
contamination, certified breath-test operators are trained to
observe a test subject carefully for at least 15-20 minutes before
administering the test and all professional breathalyzers require
the user to blow throw a tube or mouthpiece to produce a specific
sample size of air from which the concentration is devolved.
The problem with mouth alcohol being analyzed by the
breathalyzer is that it was not absorbed through the stomach and
intestines and passed through the blood to the lungs. In other
words, the machine's computer is mistakenly applying the partition
ratio (see above) and multiplying the result. Consequently, a very
tiny amount of alcohol from the mouth, throat or stomach can have a
significant impact on the breath-alcohol reading. Other than recent drinking, the most common source
of mouth alcohol is from belching or burping. This causes the
liquids and/or gases from the stomach
including any alcohol to rise up into the
soft tissue of the oesophagus and oral cavity, where it will stay
until it has dissipated. For this reason, police officers are
supposed to keep a DUI suspect under observation for at least 15
minutes prior to administering a breath test. The only approved
instrument currently available that is certified to detect mouth
alcohol is the Draeger 7510, released in 2010.
Mouth alcohol can also be created in other ways.
Dentures, for example, will trap alcohol. Periodontal disease can
also create pockets in the gums which will contain the alcohol for
longer periods. Also known to produce false results due to residual
alcohol in the mouth is passionate kissing with an intoxicated
person. Recent use of mouthwash or breath freshener
possibly to disguise the smell of alcohol when
being pulled over by police contain fairly
high levels of alcohol.
(back to top)
Common sources of Breathalyzer errors
and False Positives
The
temperature of the subject is also very important due to
Homeostatic Variables - see below. Breath testers can be very
sensitive to temperature, for example, and will give false readings
if not adjusted or recalibrated to account for ambient or
surrounding air temperatures. Breathing pattern can also
significantly affect breath test results. One study found that the
BAC readings of subjects decreased 11Ð14% after running up one
flight of stairs and 22-25% after doing so
twice. Another study found a 15% decrease in BAC readings after
vigorous exercise or hyperventilation. Hyperventilation for 20
seconds has been shown to lower the reading by approximately 32%. On
the other hand, holding one's breath for 30 seconds can increase the
breath test result by about 28%. The National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) also found that dieters
and diabetics may have acetone levels hundreds or even thousand of
times higher than those in others. Acetone is one of the many
substances that can be falsely identified as ethyl alcohol by some
breath machines. However, fuel cell based systems are non-responsive
to substances like acetone. A study in Spain showed that
metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) used in asthma treatment are also a
cause of false positives in breath machines. In general
Evidential Testers such as the Draeger 6510 are highly resisitve to
such issues as they are specifically designed for testing an
"unwilling" subject - this is why a personal, semi-conductor type
tester should never be used for testing anyone other than the owner,
who is well aware of anything they may have taken that could affect
the result.
Products that interfere with Breathalyzer testing
Products such as mouthwash or breath spray can
"fool" breath machines by significantly raising test results.
Listerine mouthwash, for example, contains 27% alcohol. The breath
machine is calibrated with the assumption that the alcohol is coming
from alcohol in the blood diffusing into the lung rather than
directly from the mouth, so it applies a partition ratio of 2100:1
in computing blood alcohol concentration
resulting in a false high test reading. To counter this, officers
are not supposed to administer a PBT for 15 minutes after the
subject eats, vomits, or puts anything in their mouth. In addition,
most instruments require that the individual be tested twice at
least two minutes apart. Mouthwash or other mouth alcohol will have
somewhat dissipated after two minutes and cause the second reading
to disagree with the first, requiring a retest.
(back to top)
Popular Breathalyzer Myths
A 2003 episode of the popular
science television show MythBusters tested a number of
methods that supposedly allow a person to fool a breathalyzer test.
The methods tested included breath mints, onions, denture cream,
mouthwash, pennies and batteries; all of these methods proved
ineffective. The show noted that using items such as breath mints,
onions, denture cream and mouthwash to cover the smell of alcohol
may fool a person, but, since they will not actually reduce a
person's BAC, there will be no effect on a breathalyzer test
regardless of the quantity used. Pennies supposedly produce a
chemical reaction, while batteries supposedly create an electrical
charge, yet neither of these methods affected the breathalyzer
results.
The Mythbusters episode also pointed out
another complication: It would be necessary to insert the item into
one's mouth (e.g. eat an onion, rinse with mouthwash, conceal a
battery), take the breath test, and then possibly remove the item Ñ
all of which would have to be accomplished discreetly enough to
avoid alerting the police officers administering the test (who would
obviously become very suspicious if they noticed that a person was
inserting items into their mouth prior to taking a breath test). It
would likely be very difficult, especially for someone in an
intoxicated state, to be able to accomplish such a feat! In addition, the show noted that breath tests are
often verified with blood tests (which are more accurate) and that
even if a person somehow managed to fool a breath test, a blood test
would certainly confirm a person's guilt. However, it is not clear
why a negative breath test would be verified by a subsequent blood
test.
Other substances that might reduce the BAC reading
include a bag of activated charcoal concealed in the mouth (to
absorb alcohol vapour), an oxidizing gas (such as N2O, Cl2, O3,
etc.) that would fool a fuel cell type detector, or an organic
interferon to fool an infrared absorption detector. A 2007 episode
of the Spike network's show Manswers showed some of the more
common and not-so-common ways of attempts to beat the breathalyzer,
none of which work. Test 1 was to suck on a copper coin. (Actually,
copper coins are now generally often only copper-coated and mostly
zinc or steel.
Test 2 was to hold a battery on the tongue. Test
3 was to chew gum. None of these tests showed a "pass" reading if
the subject had consumed alcohol.
Copyright AlcoDigital Limited 2009 |